Skip to main content

Asking for a slate that already is written into!

If I give you a slate or a notebook and a chalk or pencil, would you respond by complaining that it does not have anything written on it? Well that is how most educationist view technology as and that is what the problem with technology providers is.  We are so habituated to fast food instant noodle, that we want even our slates to be pre-written by someone else. The marketeers have lost the vision of utility of slate so much that they are still busy in selling slates with pre-written alphabets on them, and they are not giving you any chalk for your own writing as well.

Sounds absurd? Then remove slate and notebook, and put in its place the modern technology, computers, laptops, tablets and online learning solutions. In place of chalk and pencil, consider your ability to create and modify your own digital knowledge.  Of the hundreds of e-learning, online tutorials, online courses, are there any that focus on giving their learners the experience of creating knowledge on their own, putting it in practice, collaborate with peers and evaluate based on this collective learning? Most products in this space today are driven by the shortsighted product and marketing choices that focus on quickly showing the returns, KPIs that measure the success of the platform, not necessarily that of the people who learn through it.

I would not like to name the platforms, but if a website providing videos of pre-recorded coursework comes to your mind when you think of e-learning or the term edu-tech, then the point is already made. This is not to say that there aren't any platforms which kept this essence of learning alive in their core product design. Unfortunately, there needs a lot of training for the users of these platforms to make them work efficiently. The result is that, even on these platforms, people have gone back to the same pattern of instructor-to-student model of one-way information.

Another problem is the overemphasis on the mobile and tablet use cases. Yes these are great technological advances but are they suitable for every use case? Are these devices and the software they run with suitable for a complete learning experience? Are there any success stories from the hyped educational tablets that came out recently? Problem is, this form factor allows very little creative space. Forget about running advanced scientific simulations, is it even comfortable to make fairly well formatted documents on them? A learner needs experimentation, creation of things she is learning about, whether physical or virtual, visualization of concepts, sharing the thought models or the artworks, collaborate with fellow learners. In place of all of this, what profit driven markets are giving today is merely the content to be consumed. In past, we did some efforts to correct this, but could not stand long enough against the profit driven consumerism of education. Hope some sense prevails in coming times and technology does not remain a non-writable slate but an accelerator of knowledge. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

PVR is so wierd!

Yesterday we went second time to a mall bit far from office to complete the earlier failed mission of watching this 3D movie, Clash of the Titans. On ticket counter, we were first told that evening show was house full. Then we asked for a night show, and were told there isn't any show then and the gentleman handed us the pamphlet of all movie schedules. We checked on the nearby digital kiosk and also on the printed schedule to be sure of the show timings. Then went to second counter, and asked the lady for the night show tickets, and without any problem got the tickets for back seats. In fact this show was hardly 20% full, wonder how the evening show became houseful. But the biggest wonder/blunder is yet to come. On the entrance we were stopped for having a laptop bag along with (we had went straight after the office). In spite of having checked the bag, we were not allowed, because laptops were not allowed inside! Then we asked for keeping it at the baggage counter. But then, the...

What is so wrong with Bhagwad Geeta?

Here's a discussion I had with someone over Bhagwad Geeta on TOI forum (Stop reading now if you don't want to go to the end, it may mislead): mukunda (Bengaluru) replies to Siddharth 21 Jul, 2011 02:50 PM Ok,lets read ch 4 verse 13. catur-varnyam maya srstam guna-karma-vibhagasah tasya kartaram api mam viddhy akartaram avyayam "According to the three modes of material nature and the work associated with them, the four divisions of human society are created by Me. And although I am the creator of this system, you should know that I am yet the nondoer, being unchangeable." 1st line"catur-varnyam maya srstam" 4 varnas are created by Me(Paramatma),2nd line "guna-karma-vibhagasah" where the vabhajan\categorization is based on one's guna composition and karma composition. 3rd and 4th line states how He is the non doer and unchangable. Sri Krishna says that each living entity is categorized into one of the 4 varnas based ONLY on their pre...

Would you look through a window or go out and play in open?

Freedom of knowledge has always been worshiped across philosophies and religions all over the world. It has been applicable to the most fields of science and technology. This freedom has helped the growth of science, technology, and benefited the human world in every aspect. When Jonas Salk invented polio vaccine, he said "There is no patent. Could you patent the sun?" He did not try to hide its formula. When you buy a car, nobody stops you from opening its bonnet, fix a few problems, do a few modifications. That, is the freedom of knowledge, applied throughout the branches of science. But when it comes to software, abruptly, everyone starts hiding the source code, the formula behind it. You would be even denied from making similar kind of products, by means of patents. Some of the readers might have already guessed where I am taking this topic to. [Those who know enough about foss, may skip the following paragraph.] When you buy a software, it is most likely that you would...